The New York Times is facing criticism for including “death” as one of the options for getting out of student loan debt following the Supreme Court’s ruling against the Biden administration’s plan for loan forgiveness. The inclusion of “death” as an option sparked outrage among readers and advocates who felt it was inappropriate and insensitive. The Times acknowledged the criticism and later removed the option, stating that it was a mistake. They expressed regret for any distress caused and affirmed their commitment to responsible journalism.
It is common for news outlets to publish articles providing information and suggestions on how to manage or eliminate student loan debt, especially in light of significant events such as a Supreme Court ruling. The New York Times, like other publications, may have published an article outlining different options for dealing with student loan debt after the court decision. These suggestions often include strategies like income-driven repayment plans, exploring loan forgiveness programs, or seeking assistance through bankruptcy or disability discharges. The purpose of such articles is to provide readers with information and guidance on available options to alleviate their student loan burden.
Under a section that had “death” in the subheader, the article stated, “This is not something that most people would choose as a solution to their debt burden” and added federal student loan debt “dies with the person or people who take it on.”